http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/silver-spring-transit-center-will-require-additional-repairs-county-says/2013/11/19/5fe73b1a-514b-11e3-9fe0-fd2ca728e67c_story.html
With all due respect, it’s a bit of a stretch for Mr. Leggett to say that it’s simply a matter of making sure that all the “t”s are crossed and “i”s are dotted. The brand new, yet-to-be-opened concrete SSTC isn’t supposed to be cracked from stem to stern. It’s not supposed to have slabs that are more than an inch less thick than what’s called for, exposed reinforcement, missing reinforcement, concrete that’s overstressed and understrength, beams that, as designed, are unable to carry the design loads, etc. No, Mr. Leggett, this is more than about being picky. It’s about answering very serious questions about the SSTC’s structural worthiness and excessive costs for future maintenance. It’s about project oversight and managing the selection and performance of the designer, builder, inspector, and concrete tester. These aren’t little details; they’re basic responsibilities.
This reply to the Washington Post article is worth re-posting here:
ReplyDelete"Pashaspopresponds:
11/21/2013 11:10 AM EST
How much worse can this possibly get. Now we are told that 250 beams and girders need strengthening. TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY underdesigned beams and girders!
Well with last week's fix, if you are going to add 2 inches of Latex Modified Concrete to the deck to cover, but not fix, the deck cracks, you have just added 25 psf to the structure dead load and decreased the available live load capacity (for the buses) by a similar amount, without strengthening anything. Better had strengthen the entire structural framing given the likely defects found everywhere else.
And the MoCo excuse that we really didn't know about this because we were focused on the deck fix. Pathetic. Read the KCE report, it's all there. KCE Principal Allyn Killsheimer is hardly known as a 'shrinking violet'. He would have explained the problem fully in no uncertain terms. Couldn't get the Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) design calculations until late October, six months after asking for them. What! It takes one day to photocopy them, one day to put in 3-ring binders, and one day to ship with a nice cover letter. MoCo have PB under contract and can order them up at once. Why were they not submitted with the design documents for the record/permitting anyway?
As a Federal/MD/MoCo taxpayer I am appalled at the attitudes and behaviors alround. And we taxpayers are still not off the hook, despite the MoCo Council comments to the contrary. Who is paying/going to pay for the specialist legal advice needed now. Both contractor Foulger Pratt and designer PB intend to fight claims with MD/MoCo. Will any settlement cover our full costs and will it be conducted in public view. Unlikely, so we will continue paying and likely stuck with a future bill.
High time for the Feds to step in. In fact where are they since half the money is theirs.
Congress goes on about stopping 'waste, fraud and abuse', well here is a great example 200 yards from DC. Congressman Van Hollen?"